On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 08:40:06 +1030 Mark.Daniel@wasd.vsm.com.au wrote:
> TL;DR  Still hanging out for x86 native compiler(s) but there will be an
> x86-64 distribution of WASD v12.1 when released.  V9.2 performance >2x.
8< snip 8<
> Performance under V9.2, as measured by the same humble VUPS.COM on the same
> AU$300.00 pre-loved desktop reported in the PDF above -- Dell Optiplex 9020,
> Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz RAM 16.0 GB, Windows 10 Pro Version
> 22H2 Installed 17/03/2021, VirtualBox 6.1.40 -- has *** IMPROVED >2x *** and
> now exceeds that of the VSM rx2660.
> 
> |innotek GmbH VirtualBox with 2 CPU and 7574MB running VMS V9.2
> |INFO: Preventing endless loop (10$) on fast CPUs
> |Approximate System VUPs Rating : 575.2 ( min: 572.0 max: 579.2 )

Often said and usually is.

No, it is not 2x :-{  Nope, nope, nope.

X86VMS$ @vups.com
innotek GmbH VirtualBox with 2 CPU and 7574MB running VMS V9.2
Approximate System VUPs Rating : 285.1 ( min: 283.0 max: 286.6 )

A much more modest improvement on the 2021 report of 244.9, perhaps 12%.

Cannot explain this.  Sigh.  Obviously ran VUPS.COM several times, over
multiple boots, to obtain and confirm all these results.  Suspiciously close
to exactly 50% of the original report (or 200% of this one).

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:08:25 +1030 Mark.Daniel@wasd.vsm.com.au wrote:
> Some preliminary performance details with WASD and X86 VMS V9.1-A.
8< snip 8<
> VMS PERFORMANCE
> ---------------
> 
> |X86VMS$ @vups.com
> |innotek GmbH VirtualBox with 3 CPU and 4492MB running VMS V9.1-A
> |Approximate System VUPs Rating : 244.9 ( min: 244.4 max: 245.4 )
8< snip 8<